Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure as a DPS and references relevant UK procurement regulations (Public Contracts Regulations 2015/102). CPV codes are correctly assigned, and the submission deadline for joining the DPS is exceptionally long, ensuring ample time. The original DPS notice reference is provided, indicating adherence to disclosure requirements. The main minor point is the specific publication date of this amendment not being explicitly stated.
•Specific publication date of the amendment is not explicitly stated.
Clarity80/100
The description of the amendment and the purpose of the DPS are clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements for joining the DPS (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are well-documented and understandable. However, explicit evaluation criteria for awarding specific contracts under the DPS are not detailed in the provided information, which could lead to ambiguity for potential suppliers regarding mini-competition assessments.
•Explicit evaluation criteria for contract awards under the DPS are not detailed.
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are fully specified. Requirements for joining the DPS are defined. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria for subsequent contract awards, and relies on the original DPS documentation for full details, which is not provided within this tender information.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria for contract awards under the DPS.
•Full original DPS documentation is not provided, requiring external reference.
Fairness85/100
The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, e-procurement enablement with a direct link, and generic, non-tailored requirements for joining the DPS. The extended submission deadline for joining the DPS is highly reasonable. The primary concern for fairness is the absence of explicit award criteria for contracts under the DPS, which ideally should be transparently available.
•Explicit award criteria for contracts under the DPS are not detailed in the provided information.
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via the provided Panacea software link, enhancing practicality. The duration is specified, and the estimated value is known. However, specific contract start dates are not applicable for a DPS, and detailed financing information beyond the estimated value is not provided. The reliance on an external platform for all detailed documentation also impacts self-contained practicality.
•Limited detailed financing information beyond the estimated value.
•Reliance on an external platform for all detailed documentation.
Data Consistency90/100
All key fields are populated, and the information provided is highly consistent. The amendment clearly references the original DPS, and dates are logical within the context of an ongoing dynamic purchasing system. There are no reported suspensions or disputes.
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement initiatives or a focus on innovation, which are increasingly important for a comprehensive sustainability profile.
•No explicit mention of green procurement.
•No explicit focus on innovation.