Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes are appropriate. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the 'reveal date' is missing, which slightly hinders full transparency regarding the initial publication timeline.
Clarity60/100
The service description is clear and the AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are well-articulated. However, a significant deficiency is the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and deadlines are provided. Location and CPV codes are also present. A major concern is that only one out of four tender documents has content/summaries, implying critical information might be missing for bidders. The absence of evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.
•Only 1 of 4 documents has content/summary
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness55/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. The submission deadline is reasonable. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria significantly compromises transparency and objectivity. Furthermore, the absence of e-submission and the limited access to full tender documents (only one summary provided) reduce equal access and fairness for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a standard expectation for modern procurement processes. A direct URL to the full tender documents is also not provided in the given information, creating a practical hurdle for interested parties.
•No e-submission
•No document URL provided
Data Consistency85/100
Key dates are logical and consistent, and the tender status is active with no reported disputes. Most essential fields are populated. Minor inconsistencies include 'N/A' for procedure codes and an empty 'Liable Person' field.
•"Liable Person" empty
•"N/A" for procedure codes
Sustainability65/100
While the tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, innovation, or EU funding, the core service itself (Child Criminal Exploitation Support) is inherently focused on significant social welfare and safeguarding vulnerable populations. This strong social aspect contributes positively to its sustainability profile.
•No explicit green procurement
•No explicit innovation focus