Legal Compliance85/100
As a Prior Information Notice, this document fulfills its purpose by informing the market of an upcoming tender. The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined. The anticipated timeline for the future tender appears reasonable, though the exact reveal date for the full tender is not specified.
•Missing reveal date for the actual tender document.
Clarity80/100
The description of the service, its scope, and the technical capability requirements are very clear and unambiguous for a PIN. It explicitly states which details (e.g., exclusion, eligibility, financial, submission, evaluation criteria) will be provided in the full tender documents, which is appropriate for this notice type.
•Evaluation criteria are not yet specified (expected for a PIN).
Completeness75/100
The PIN provides all essential basic information, including title, organization, reference, estimated value, duration, and anticipated deadlines. While full tender requirements and evaluation criteria are not detailed, this is explicitly stated as forthcoming, which is standard for a PIN.
•Full requirements (exclusion, eligibility, financial, submission) and evaluation criteria are not yet detailed (expected for a PIN).
Fairness60/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the lack of electronic submission support significantly impacts equal access and fairness for potential bidders. Evaluation criteria are also not yet specified, which is a future concern for transparency.
•Lack of electronic submission support.
•Evaluation criteria not yet specified.
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.
•Lack of electronic submission support.
Data Consistency95/100
All key fields are populated or clearly indicated as forthcoming. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (publication in January, submission in February, contract start in March) are logical and consistent.
Sustainability40/100
While the service itself inherently addresses a significant social need (supporting independent living), the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, broader social clauses for bidders, or innovation-focused criteria within the procurement process itself.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria for bidders (beyond the service's inherent social value).