Legal Compliance75/100
The tender states compliance with the Procurement Act 2023 and uses a correct CPV code. The 'Restricted' procedure is defined, and the submission period is exceptionally long, which is positive. However, the 'Code: N/A' for procedure type and the implied lack of full tender documents at this 'active' stage are minor concerns.
•Procedure type code 'N/A'
•Full tender documents not yet available for an 'active' tender
Clarity80/100
The tender's description is clear, outlining the purpose, scope, and structure into 5 Lots. AI-extracted requirements are well-articulated and understandable. The primary drawback is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV/NUTS codes are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit statement that full tender documents (SQ/ITT) are 'once released' and the missing evaluation criteria.
•Full tender documents (SQ/ITT) not yet available
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, which promotes fair competition. However, the lack of evaluation criteria for the selection stage and the absence of e-submission are significant fairness concerns. Full document access is also pending.
•No evaluation criteria specified for selection stage
•No e-submission supported
Practicality65/100
The tender suffers from significant practical issues. Electronic submission is not supported, which is a major drawback for modern procurement. Critically, the contract start date is listed as identical to the submission deadline, which is an impossible and impractical timeline.
•No e-submission supported
•Contract start date identical to submission deadline
Data Consistency60/100
While most key fields are populated, there is a critical inconsistency: the contract start date is listed as 2026-12-01, which is the same as the submission deadline. This represents a fundamental logical error in the tender's timeline. Minor omissions include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.
•Contract start date is identical to submission deadline
•Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded. This indicates a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria