Legal Compliance65/100
The procedure type and CPV code are correctly identified. However, the absence of a reveal date and, critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance deficiencies under public procurement regulations.
•Missing reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity60/100
The service description and AI-extracted requirements are detailed and unambiguous, providing a clear understanding of the scope of work. Nevertheless, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely hinders the clarity of the bidding process for potential suppliers.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to missing the liable person, the official reveal date, and crucially, the evaluation criteria. The status of the 'Official PDF Version' being 'Required: No' also raises questions about the completeness of accessible documentation.
•Missing liable person
•Missing reveal date
Fairness40/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw that severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the selection process. The lack of e-submission and ambiguous document access further reduce equal opportunity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality45/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities and the absence of a direct URL for comprehensive tender documents present significant practical hurdles for bidders.
•No e-submission
•No explicit document URL provided
Data Consistency75/100
Key dates (submission, contract start) and duration are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.
•Missing liable person
•N/A codes for procedure type
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly includes an 'Innovation Focus,' which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific criteria related to green procurement or broader social aspects, limiting its overall sustainability profile.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria