RETENDER: Ceredigion, Ysgol y Dderi - New Heating System and Associated Works / Ceredigion, Ysgol y Dderi – System Wresogi Newydd a Gwaith Cysylltiedig

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies, primarily a critical inconsistency in the estimated contract value and a complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, severely impacting transparency and fairness. While the project scope is clear, the overall quality of the procurement documentation and process is compromised by these fundamental issues.

The tender defines the procedure type and uses appropriate CPV/NUTS codes. The submission deadline is reasonable. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant omissions that could lead to legal challenges regarding transparency and fair competition. The value discrepancy also poses a disclosure issue.

The project description and scope of work are clear. However, the AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are highly generic and lack specific details or standards. The complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, severely impacting the clarity of the tender process.

Basic tender information such as title, organization, deadlines, duration, and location is present. However, the critical absence of detailed, specific requirements, eligibility criteria, and evaluation criteria represents a major gap. The significant discrepancy in the estimated value also indicates incomplete or conflicting financial data. Only one document summary is provided, raising questions about the full documentation.

The most significant fairness concerns are the complete lack of evaluation criteria, which undermines transparency and objectivity, and the absence of e-submission, which can create barriers to equal access for potential bidders. The substantial inconsistency in the disclosed estimated value also impacts transparency and can mislead bidders. Requirements are generic, not tailored, but their vagueness doesn't promote fair competition.

The lack of electronic submission is a major practical drawback in modern procurement, increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of a direct document URL and detailed financing information further reduces the practicality and ease of access for interested parties.

The most severe issue is the direct contradiction between the 'Estimated Value' field (1.00 EUR) and the value stated in the description (£200,000 - £220,000). This fundamental inconsistency significantly compromises the reliability and trustworthiness of the tender data. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender information provides no indication of any environmental, social, or innovation-related criteria or objectives. This suggests a complete lack of focus on sustainability aspects, which is a missed opportunity for modern public procurement.