Community Safety Public Perception Survey

This tender for a Community Safety Public Perception Survey presents significant deficiencies in transparency and accessibility, primarily due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission. While the project description is clear and detailed, critical information gaps and procedural shortcomings hinder fair competition and modern procurement practices.

The tender specifies an open procedure and includes a CPV code. However, the critical issue of a missing official tender reveal date makes it difficult to fully assess the legal compliance regarding the submission period's reasonableness. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The project description is clear and the AI-extracted technical requirements are well-articulated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity flaw, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be judged.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover).

The absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the process. Furthermore, the lack of electronic submission creates an accessibility barrier. The specific experience requirements, while relevant, could be seen as restrictive, potentially limiting competition to a narrow pool of providers.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While the contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of e-submission complicates the bidding process for potential providers.

Key fields are generally populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. A minor inconsistency is the 'N/A' code for 'Type' and 'Procedure' despite 'Open procedure' being stated.

The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus' characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it explicitly lacks green procurement criteria and social aspects, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations.