Legal Compliance75/100
The 30-day submission period is generally reasonable for an open procedure. The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined and appropriate. However, the summary lacks explicit mention of standard mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which should ideally be referenced even if detailed in full documents.
•Lack of explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the summary.
Clarity60/100
The technical requirements and project description are clear and understandable. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness55/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are complete. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria, and the lack of specific eligibility, financial, and mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary, significantly impacts the overall completeness of the tender information.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
•No specific eligibility requirements mentioned in the summary.
Fairness50/100
Document access is provided via an e-procurement platform, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements do not appear tailored. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the transparency and objectivity of the procurement process, directly impacting fairness for all bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity.
Practicality60/100
Electronic submission is supported via eTenderWales, and the document URL, contract start date, and duration are provided. However, the lack of evaluation criteria makes it impractical for bidders to formulate a competitive and compliant bid without further essential information.
•No evaluation criteria specified, hindering practical bid preparation.
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and 'Type'/'Procedure' codes are 'N/A', which are minor omissions but do not indicate critical inconsistencies.
•Liable Person field is empty.
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly highlights an 'Innovation Focus', which is a positive characteristic. However, there is no mention of green procurement or social aspects, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.