United Kingdom4 days leftOpen

Request for Quotation - North Northamptonshire Council - Severe Mental Health Illness (SMI) and Mental Health Inequalities Project

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Leicestershire, Rutland and Northamptonshire, United Kingdom

VALUE

£70,000

DEADLINE

February 06, 2026 at 16:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

85000000

REFERENCE

002447-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

North Northamptonshire Council invites quotations to design and deliver a community-focused programme that addresses mental health inequalities, with specific emphasis on improving outcomes for people living with Severe Mental Illness (SMI). The programme is structured into three Lots and will include activities such as awareness-raising, culturally competent engagement, capacity building, resource development, signposting, and collaboration with local partners. Direct delivery of health checks or formal referral management is excluded. Lots: • Lot 1: Mental Health Awareness and Early Access (Indicative budget • Lot 2: Understanding SMI and Physical Health (Indicative budget • Lot 3: Reducing Inequalities in Access and Uptake Contract Value: Total maximum budget for all Lots combined: £70,000 (Inclusive of VAT ). Quotations exceeding the capped budget will be rejected. Contract Term: Expected contract period: 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2027. Submission Instructions: Suppliers must complete the RFQ response and return by email to: • Contact name: Yvonne Powell, Commissioning Manager - Public Health • Email: nncphcommissioning@northnorthants.gov.uk • Bid submission deadline: Friday, 6 February 2026 , 4:00 pm.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • None explicitly stated in the provided information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF002447-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a Request for Quotation from North Northamptonshire Council inviting bids for a £70,000 community-focused program to address mental health inequalities and improve outcomes for people with Severe Mental Illness (SMI) across three lots, with submissions due by email by February 6, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

55
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a community-focused mental health program with clear service objectives and an innovation focus. However, it suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, notably the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and inconsistencies in key data, which could hinder fair competition.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance65/100

The tender defines its procedure type and CPV code appropriately. The submission window of 19 days from today's date is generally reasonable for a below-threshold RFQ. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal transparency requirement for open competitions. The 'Required: No' status for the main PDF document raises concerns about full legal disclosure.

Missing evaluation criteria
Ambiguous document access ('Required: No' for PDF)
Clarity55/100

The description of the program, its objectives, and the division into Lots is clear and understandable. However, the tender significantly lacks clarity regarding how bids will be evaluated, as no evaluation criteria are specified. Detailed supplier requirements are also not explicitly provided in the summary.

No evaluation criteria specified
Minimal supplier requirements detailed
Completeness50/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are present. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty. Crucially, the main tender document (PDF) is marked as 'Required: No,' which is a fundamental flaw if it contains the full terms. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed supplier requirements also indicates incompleteness.

'Liable Person' missing
Main tender document marked 'Required: No'
Fairness45/100

The tender's value is disclosed, and the service requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as bidders cannot understand the basis for award. The submission via email rather than a formal e-procurement platform may also present challenges for equal access and auditability. The ambiguous access to the full tender document ('Required: No' for PDF) is also a concern.

No evaluation criteria specified
Email-only submission (not e-procurement platform)
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission via email is supported, and key dates (contract start, duration) and financing information are clearly stated. However, the absence of a direct URL for the tender documents makes access less straightforward than ideal. Email submission, while functional, lacks the structured benefits of a dedicated e-procurement portal.

No direct document URL
Email-only submission (not e-procurement platform)
Data Consistency40/100

The tender exhibits several inconsistencies. The estimated value is stated as 70,000.00 EUR in the basic information but £70,000 in the description, which is a significant currency discrepancy. The 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts the fact that the value is disclosed. The 'Required: No' status for the main PDF document is also highly inconsistent with a functional tender process. The 'Liable Person' field is unpopulated.

Currency inconsistency (EUR vs GBP)
Contradictory 'Value Classified' status
Sustainability70/100

The tender's core purpose is to address mental health inequalities and improve outcomes for people with Severe Mental Illness, which is a strong social aspect. It also explicitly highlights an 'Innovation Focus.' While it does not specify green procurement criteria or additional social clauses for suppliers, its inherent nature contributes positively to sustainability.

No explicit green procurement criteria

Strengths

Clear description of the service and project objectives
Project addresses significant social aspects (mental health inequalities)
Explicitly includes an innovation focus
Key timelines (submission, contract start, duration) are specified
Value is disclosed (despite currency inconsistency)

Concerns

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
Ambiguous or potentially missing access to the full tender document ('Required: No' for PDF)
Significant data inconsistencies (currency, value classification, missing liable person)
Submission via email rather than a formal e-procurement platform
Minimal detail on supplier-specific requirements

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Ensure the full tender document (RFQ) is clearly accessible and marked as required for bidders.
3. Rectify all data inconsistencies, especially regarding the contract value currency and classification.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
55/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes