Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines an open procedure with reasonable submission deadlines and appropriate CPV codes. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing explicit financial requirements
Clarity60/100
The description of the required services, contract lots, duration, and key dates is clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Essential information such as title, reference, organization, description, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing financial requirements
Fairness45/100
The open procedure and division into flexible lots promote competition and prevent tailoring. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their offers will be judged. The lack of e-submission also reduces equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and the lot structure offers flexibility. However, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden.
•No e-submission
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency90/100
The core data points such as title, reference, description, deadlines, and duration are consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a clearly stated estimated value.
•'Liable Person' field empty
•'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts disclosed value
Sustainability30/100
The tender information and automated checks indicate a complete absence of any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus, representing a missed opportunity for broader positive impact.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria