C-013568 Inclusive Youth Project

This tender for an Inclusive Youth Project demonstrates good clarity in its requirements and evaluation criteria, but is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission and some missing legal and administrative details.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly. However, the absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and the missing liable person are notable omissions, impacting full legal compliance.

The project description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-defined and understandable. Evaluation criteria (80% quality, 10% social value, 10% price) are explicitly stated, despite conflicting automated flags.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender lacks a specified liable person and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds. Only one document is listed, which may indicate incomplete representation of the full tender package.

The requirements appear generic and not tailored, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of electronic submission significantly reduces equal access and fairness for potential bidders in a modern procurement context.

The lack of electronic submission is a major practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders. While the contract start date and duration are clear, no explicit document URL is provided.

There are inconsistencies between the automated check results/issues flags and the detailed AI-extracted requirements/document summary, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and social aspects. The 'Value Classified: Yes' also contradicts the explicit estimated value.

The tender explicitly includes social value as a 10% evaluation criterion, which is a strong positive given the project's nature. However, there is no mention or focus on green procurement or innovation aspects.