London and Quadrant Housing Trust - Fuel Dynamic Purchasing System(DPS)

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for fuel supplies, demonstrating good legal compliance and clear basic requirements, but suffers from significant gaps in transparency and practicality, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission.

The tender explicitly references compliance with the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Regulation 34 for DPS) and correctly assigns the CPV code. The procedure type is clearly defined. While the reveal date is missing, the submission deadline is far in the future, providing ample time for a DPS. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

The description of the service and the AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their applications will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, description, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the estimated value is classified, and crucial evaluation criteria are missing, which are significant omissions for a comprehensive tender document.

The classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely impact the transparency and objectivity of the procurement process, raising concerns about fairness. The lack of e-submission also creates potential barriers to equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is not provided, and financing information (estimated value) is unavailable. While duration is clear, the contract start date is not fixed for a DPS.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent. Minor gaps include the missing 'Liable Person' and the classified estimated value, but these do not indicate major inconsistencies.

The tender shows no explicit focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of integration of broader sustainability objectives.