iXBRL Tagging of Financial Statements

This tender for iXBRL tagging services provides a clear description of the required work and technical capabilities but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds, impacting its overall fairness and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. The submission period appears reasonable (23 days). However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance deficiencies. The missing reveal date is also a minor issue.

The description of the service, objectives, scope of work, deliverables, and provider requirements are very clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it unclear to bidders how their proposals will be assessed, which is a major clarity flaw.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location is provided. Requirements are detailed. The primary deficiency is the critical absence of evaluation criteria, which is fundamental for a complete tender package. Minor gaps include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' for procedure codes.

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements are generally generic, not appearing tailored to a specific company, though the 'on-site attendance' could slightly favor local providers. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly. The absence of e-submission also limits equal access.

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

The tender exhibits good data consistency, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. Most key fields are populated, with only minor omissions like the 'Liable Person' and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.

The tender explicitly highlights an "Innovation Focus," which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks any specified green procurement criteria or social aspects, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability considerations.