London and Quadrant Housing Trust - Bricks Distributor Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)

The overall quality of this tender is moderate, presenting significant gaps in transparency and procedural clarity, though the submission deadline is sufficiently long. Key improvements are needed in defining evaluation criteria and disclosing financial details.

The tender explicitly references compliance with Public Contracts Regulations 2015. However, there is a significant contradiction between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)' nature, which are distinct legal procedures. The estimated value is classified, and the reveal date is missing, impacting full disclosure requirements.

The general description of the organization and project purpose is clear. However, the fundamental ambiguity regarding the procedure type (Restricted vs DPS) creates confusion. Crucially, evaluation criteria are not specified, and only a very basic requirement (mandatory exclusion grounds) is extracted, indicating a lack of detailed requirements in the provided summary.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, description, CPV, and duration are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and evaluation criteria are explicitly missing. The AI-extracted requirements are minimal, suggesting a lack of comprehensive detail in the provided tender snippet.

The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) inherently promotes fairness by allowing new suppliers to join throughout its duration. The submission deadline is very long, providing ample preparation time. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinder transparency and equal opportunity for bidders to prepare competitive proposals. The lack of e-submission is also a drawback for equal access.

The duration of the contract is clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The undisclosed estimated value makes it challenging for potential bidders to assess the commercial viability and resource commitment required.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the classification fields stating 'Restricted' procedure while the description clearly indicates a 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)', which is an open procedure. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender information provided does not include any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations in the provided summary.