Legal Compliance75/100
The tender correctly identifies the procedure as a DPS and assigns an appropriate CPV code. The submission deadline is very generous. However, the summary defers details on mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements to an external platform, which, while common, means these are not immediately available in the provided data.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in summary
•Financial requirements not detailed in summary
Clarity65/100
The service description is clear and unambiguous, detailing client groups and geographical scope. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the deferral of full mandatory and financial requirements to an external platform significantly reduce the overall clarity of the provided information.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements not detailed in summary
Completeness60/100
Basic information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are present. However, critical details such as full mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and all evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as missing from this summary, requiring bidders to access external documents for a complete understanding.
•Missing full mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in summary
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness60/100
The tender supports e-procurement and the requirements appear generic, not tailored. The submission deadline is very reasonable. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria in the provided information is a significant transparency issue, hindering bidders' ability to understand how their proposals will be judged.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency
Practicality70/100
Electronic submission is supported via the ProContract platform, which is practical. The duration is clearly specified for both individual contracts and the DPS. However, a direct URL to the full tender documents is not provided in the summary, requiring manual navigation.
•No direct URL to full tender documents provided
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent (e.g., DPS 2021 title with active status and future deadline). There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, which is a minor gap.
•Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria,' which is a positive aspect of sustainability, given the nature of the services. However, there is no explicit mention or focus on green procurement or innovation within the provided information.
•No explicit green procurement focus
•No explicit innovation focus