Dynamic Purchasing System for Consultancy Services

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) provides clear basic information and a very generous submission deadline. However, it significantly lacks critical details regarding evaluation criteria and comprehensive legal/financial requirements within the provided summary, impacting clarity and fairness.

The tender benefits from a very long and reasonable submission deadline and correctly assigned CPV codes. However, the procedure type is inconsistently described as 'Restricted' while the description clearly indicates a 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS), which is an open procedure. Crucial mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements are stated as 'Not specified' in this summary, deferring these fundamental legal aspects to an external portal.

The overall purpose and scope of consultancy services for social housing are clearly described. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for bidders to understand how proposals will be assessed. Additionally, detailed legal and financial requirements are not present in this summary, reducing overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and CPV code are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and the deferral of essential legal and financial requirements to an external e-procurement portal, which are not part of the provided document content.

The tender promotes fairness through a disclosed value, e-procurement support, and an exceptionally long submission deadline. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot objectively prepare proposals or understand the selection process.

Electronic submission is clearly supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and a direct URL for full documents is not explicitly given in the provided text, though implied by the reference to an e-procurement portal.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the classification of the procedure as 'Restricted' while the description clearly defines it as a 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS).

The tender demonstrates a strong focus on social aspects, explicitly listing 'Social Criteria' and being issued by an organization dedicated to social housing. However, it lacks explicit mention of green procurement initiatives or an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded.