Dynamic Purchasing System for the Provision of Passenger Transport Services

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is generally well-structured in its basic information but critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness. Practical access is also hindered by the absence of a direct document URL.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type as an Open procedure for a Dynamic Purchasing System and includes a relevant CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, indicating compliance with basic legal frameworks. The missing 'reveal date' is a minor transparency issue, but for an ongoing DPS, the submission deadline is reasonable.

The tender's title, description, and high-level requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern, as bidders cannot fully understand how their applications will be assessed beyond meeting basic eligibility.

Most essential information, such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location, is provided. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the missing 'Liable Person' field represent significant gaps in completeness.

The tender discloses the estimated value and its requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines fairness and transparency, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and objectively judged applications. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises minor fairness concerns.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of a direct URL to the tender documents creates a significant practical barrier for potential bidders. The contradiction regarding e-submission also impacts practicality.

Dates are logical and consistent for an ongoing Dynamic Purchasing System. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there is a notable contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check indicating 'No e-submission'.

The tender explicitly lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.