London and Quadrant Housing Trust - Skips (Waste Management) Dynamic Purchasing System(DPS)

This tender clearly defines the establishment of a DPS but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria and detailed requirements, impacting transparency and fairness.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type as a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) under Regulation 34 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, indicating compliance with national procurement law. The CPV code is appropriately assigned, and no disputes are reported. However, the missing reveal date and classified estimated value detract from full transparency, which is a component of legal compliance.

The overall description of the tender's objective (establishing a DPS for Skips/Waste Management) is clear. However, the AI-extracted requirements are high-level and lack specific detail for eligibility, technical capability, and financial aspects. Critically, the tender explicitly lacks specified evaluation criteria, which is a major clarity issue for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and CPV code are provided. A document is attached and summarized. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of detailed requirements beyond broad categories and, most significantly, the lack of specified evaluation criteria. The classified value also impacts completeness from a transparency perspective.

The tender supports e-procurement and the requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. The submission deadline provides ample time for preparation, especially for a DPS. However, the classified estimated value reduces transparency, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely undermines the objectivity and transparency of the selection process, posing a significant fairness concern for bidders.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, a direct URL to the tender documents is not provided, which is a practical hurdle. The classified estimated value also makes it difficult for potential bidders to assess the commercial viability of participating.

Most key fields are populated, and the dates are logical and consistent with an active DPS. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor gaps include the 'Liable Person' field and the missing 'reveal date', but these do not indicate inconsistencies in the provided data.

The tender description and requirements make no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.