Legal Compliance60/100
The tender lacks a specified reveal date, making it impossible to assess the reasonableness of the preparation period. Crucially, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds are not provided, and evaluation criteria are missing, which are fundamental for legal compliance. The procedure type and CPV codes are correctly identified.
•Missing reveal date
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided
Clarity65/100
The description of the required furniture and the scope of beneficiaries is clear. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders. The 'Required: No' status for the main PDF document is also confusing.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided
Completeness55/100
While basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds. Furthermore, only one of four listed documents has a summary, and its 'Required: No' status suggests a lack of comprehensive tender documentation.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds provided
Fairness45/100
Fairness is significantly compromised by the absence of evaluation criteria, preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be judged. The missing reveal date makes it impossible to assess if sufficient preparation time was allowed. The lack of e-submission and limited document access also hinder equal opportunity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Missing reveal date (impacts assessment of preparation time)
Practicality55/100
The tender's practicality is hampered by the lack of electronic submission capabilities, which can create barriers for bidders. No direct URL to a comprehensive e-procurement portal is provided, making it less convenient for interested parties to access full documentation.
•No e-submission
•No direct URL to full tender documents/e-procurement portal
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The estimated value in EUR aligns with the GBP equivalent mentioned in the PDF summary. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'Code: N/A' for procedure type.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•'Code: N/A' for procedure type
Sustainability75/100
The tender scores well in sustainability due to the explicit requirement for outdoor furniture made from recycled plastic, demonstrating a clear commitment to green procurement. However, it does not explicitly include social aspects or an innovation focus, nor is it EU funded.
•No explicit social criteria
•No explicit innovation focus