Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the open procedure and assigns a relevant CPV code. No disputes are reported, and the submission deadline provides a reasonable timeframe. While mandatory exclusion grounds are referred to the full documents, this is standard practice.
•Missing reveal date in the provided data
Clarity60/100
The service description is clear and unambiguous, outlining the council's needs for flexible and value-focused temporary accommodation. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial/exclusion grounds in the summary significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Financial and mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in the summary
Completeness65/100
Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, and deadline are present. However, the tender lacks explicit contract duration, and only one document summary is provided out of four, suggesting potential incompleteness in the accessible information. Evaluation criteria are also missing.
•Missing contract duration
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100
The tender discloses the estimated value and features generic requirements not tailored to a specific company, promoting broader participation. The 'E-Procurement' characteristic also supports equal access. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, making the assessment process opaque and significantly undermining transparency and fairness.
•Missing evaluation criteria (critical for transparency and fairness)
Practicality60/100
The 'E-Procurement' characteristic suggests electronic submission, though an automated check flags 'No e-submission,' creating ambiguity. The lack of a specific contract start date, explicit document URL, and clear contract duration reduces the practicality for bidders to plan and prepare effectively.
•Contradiction regarding e-submission functionality
•No explicit document URL provided
Data Consistency75/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. However, some fields like 'Liable Person' are empty, and 'Type'/'Procedure' codes are 'N/A', indicating minor data gaps. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' is also a consistency concern.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for Type/Procedure
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag
Sustainability40/100
While the service itself addresses a social need (temporary accommodation), the tender summary does not explicitly include additional green procurement, social criteria for suppliers, or a strong focus on innovation beyond a general commitment to 'continued change and improvement.'
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria for suppliers (beyond the service's inherent nature)