Legal Compliance75/100
The tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System, which is a legally recognized and flexible procurement procedure. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. The continuous application nature of a DPS inherently provides reasonable timeframes for suppliers.
•Missing initial reveal date
Clarity60/100
The description of the DPS and the scope of works is clear and understandable. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and, crucially, evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity of the application process.
•No mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated
•No financial requirements explicitly stated
Completeness65/100
Basic tender information such as title, organization, reference, value, and duration is provided. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete regarding essential details like mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and how applications will be evaluated. Only one document summary out of four total documents is also a concern.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing financial requirements
Fairness60/100
The DPS structure allows for continuous application, promoting fair access over time. The requirements for contractors appear generic and not tailored. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermines transparency and fairness in the assessment process.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Potential limited access to all tender documents (only one summary provided)
Practicality70/100
The tender indicates support for e-procurement and clearly specifies the contract duration and the commencement date for the additional categories. However, a direct URL for tender documents is not provided, and specific financing details beyond the estimated value are absent.
•No direct document URL
•No specific financing information beyond estimated value
Data Consistency85/100
Key dates, including the DPS term end and contract duration, are logical and consistent. Most essential fields are populated, contributing to good data integrity. A minor contradiction regarding e-submission was noted in automated checks but not in the tender's explicit characteristics.
•"Liable Person" field is empty
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social responsibility, or innovation-focused criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to align with modern sustainable procurement practices.
•No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria