WCC Healthy Lifestyle Service

This tender for a Healthy Lifestyle Service exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and consistency, particularly due to missing evaluation criteria and contradictory information, which severely impacts fairness and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements represents a significant non-compliance with standard procurement regulations, hindering transparency and legal soundness.

While the service description and AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are clear, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity failure. Furthermore, the contradiction between 'single provider' and 'Divided into Parts' creates significant ambiguity regarding the tender's structure.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are largely present. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements. Only one of four tender documents is summarized, suggesting limited access to full information.

The complete lack of evaluation criteria is a severe impediment to fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. Limited document access and the contradiction regarding e-submission further undermine equal access and a level playing field. The 25-day submission window for a complex service in a restricted procedure is also relatively tight.

The absence of a direct document URL and the contradiction regarding e-submission capabilities ('E-Procurement' listed but 'No e-submission' flagged) create practical hurdles for potential bidders. While contract start and duration are clear, the overall ease of access and submission is compromised.

This tender suffers from significant data inconsistencies. The most critical contradictions are between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission', and 'Divided into Parts' and 'seeking a single provider'. These fundamental discrepancies can cause confusion and procedural issues.

The service itself inherently addresses a social need by promoting healthy lifestyles. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, broader social clauses, or innovation-focused criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to leverage procurement for wider sustainability objectives.