BMS Building Maintenance

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies across multiple critical categories, particularly in legal compliance, clarity, completeness, and fairness due to the absence of full tender documents and evaluation criteria. There are also notable data inconsistencies.

The tender lacks a reveal date, which prevents full assessment of the 7-day rule, though 19 days from today's date for submission is generally reasonable. Critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of full tender documents are major legal compliance failures. The procedure type and CPV code are correctly identified.

While the core description of the services and sites is clear, the overall clarity for bidders is severely hampered by the explicit absence of evaluation criteria. Furthermore, financial requirements are merely a heading, and performance conditions are not detailed, making it difficult for bidders to understand how to prepare a competitive offer.

The tender provides basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines. However, it is critically incomplete due to the absence of full tender documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria. Detailed financial requirements are also missing.

Fairness is severely compromised by the lack of full document access and the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for transparency and equal treatment of bidders. A contradiction regarding electronic submission (AI says yes, automated check says no) further undermines fairness.

The practicality for bidders is low due to the absence of a clear URL for full tender documents and the contradiction regarding electronic submission. While a contract start date and duration are provided, the fundamental lack of accessible documentation makes participation impractical.

There are significant data inconsistencies, including a discrepancy in the estimated value (EUR vs. GBP in the PDF summary), a direct contradiction regarding electronic submission, and a mismatch in the reported number of documents versus those with content. The 'Liable Person' field is also missing.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.