Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, along with a missing reveal date, presents minor compliance gaps for a below-threshold procurement.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds details
•Missing financial requirements details
Clarity75/100
The service description and technical capability requirements are clearly articulated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Vague performance conditions
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. Nevertheless, critical elements such as detailed financial requirements, mandatory exclusion grounds, and especially evaluation criteria are missing. The status of full tender documents is also unclear.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing financial requirements
Fairness50/100
Fairness is significantly compromised by the complete lack of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective and transparent assessment. The absence of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access. The classified value and specific qualification requirement, while not necessarily tailored, can be restrictive.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission support
Practicality65/100
The tender specifies contract start and duration, which is practical. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a major practical drawback in modern procurement. The absence of a document URL and detailed financing information also reduces practicality.
•No electronic submission support
•No document URL provided
Data Consistency75/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. However, several key fields are unpopulated (e.g., Liable Person, Type/Procedure Codes N/A), and critical sections like exclusion grounds and financial requirements are absent, indicating some data gaps.
•Unpopulated 'Liable Person' field
•Type/Procedure Codes marked N/A
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which typically encourages higher sustainability standards.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social aspects included