Legal Compliance75/100
The tender correctly identifies itself as a DPS, which is a compliant procurement procedure allowing continuous application. The CPV code is appropriate, and no disputes are flagged. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned as being in the application pack, which is standard for a DPS initial notice.
Clarity80/100
The description of the DPS's purpose, the challenges it addresses, and the application process via email are very clear. AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. However, detailed selection/evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS are deferred to the application pack, reducing immediate transparency.
•Detailed selection/evaluation criteria for DPS admission are not specified in the initial notice.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, estimated value, and CPV code are provided. However, the duration of the DPS itself is not specified, and detailed criteria for admission are only available upon request of the application pack. The listed 'Submission Deadline' is misleading for a DPS.
•Duration of the DPS is not specified.
•Detailed selection/exclusion criteria are deferred to an application pack that must be requested.
Fairness65/100
The ongoing application process inherent to a DPS promotes fairness by allowing continuous entry. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, requiring an email request for the application pack, rather than direct download, creates a slight barrier. The contradiction regarding 'E-Procurement' vs. email-based application also impacts perceived fairness and equal access.
•Application pack requires email request, not direct download.
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and email-based application process.
Practicality65/100
The email-based application process is less practical than a dedicated e-procurement portal with direct document access. The absence of a specified DPS duration can make long-term planning difficult for potential applicants. No direct document URL is provided.
•No direct document URL; application pack must be requested via email.
•No dedicated e-submission platform, contradicting 'E-Procurement' characteristic.
Data Consistency60/100
There are significant inconsistencies: the listed 'Submission Deadline' directly contradicts the explicit statement that it's a DPS with no bid deadline and ongoing applications. Additionally, the 'E-Procurement' characteristic conflicts with the email-based application process and the 'No e-submission' automated check result.
•Inconsistency between listed 'Submission Deadline' and DPS nature (ongoing application).
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and email-based application/no e-submission.
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly highlights an 'Innovation Focus', which is a positive aspect. However, there is no mention of green procurement criteria or social aspects, limiting its overall sustainability score.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social aspects mentioned.