Sunderland Museum and Winter Gardens Redevlopment

This tender for the Sunderland Museum redevelopment shows good clarity in technical requirements and practical aspects but suffers from significant incompleteness and fairness issues due to missing evaluation criteria and a lack of explicit legal grounds.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly identified, and no disputes are reported. However, the 'Missing reveal date' is a procedural transparency issue. The AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public tenders.

The project description and technical capability requirements are clear and specific. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information like title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are present. However, the tender is incomplete regarding crucial details such as explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and, most importantly, evaluation criteria. Only one document summary is provided out of four total, suggesting potential gaps in accessible documentation.

The estimated value is disclosed, and electronic submission is indicated. However, the absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the process. The technical requirements, while potentially justifiable for a specialized project, are quite specific (e.g., experience with listed buildings, museums, projects of similar value), which could limit competition.

The tender clearly specifies the contract start date and duration. Electronic submission via the 'Open platform' is indicated, which enhances accessibility. Financing information (estimated value) is available.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant discrepancy between the estimated value stated in the basic information (9,000,000.00 EUR) and the value mentioned in the document summary (£7.5M, approximately 8.7M EUR). The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and some codes are listed as N/A.

The tender explicitly mentions an 'Innovation Focus,' which is a positive aspect. However, there are no indications of green procurement criteria or specific social aspects being integrated into the tender requirements.