Legal Compliance55/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly. However, the absence of a reveal date prevents assessment of deadline reasonableness, and the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues.
•Missing reveal date, preventing assessment of 7+ day rule.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Clarity65/100
The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness60/100
Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are well-defined. However, the tender refers to a 'suite of tender documents' but only one is provided in the input, indicating incomplete documentation. The absence of evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds further impacts completeness.
•Only one document provided from a 'suite of tender documents'.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Fairness45/100
The tender discloses the value and includes a fair mechanism (bid for one, win one) for the two opportunities. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria, absence of e-submission, and incomplete document access significantly undermine the transparency and equal access for all potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
•No e-submission option available.
Practicality60/100
Contract start date, duration, and financing information are clearly provided. However, the absence of electronic submission and a direct document URL reduces the practicality and ease of access for interested parties.
•No e-submission option available.
•No document URL provided.
Data Consistency85/100
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and CPV code are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and dates are logical. Minor gaps include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' for procedure codes.
•'Liable Person' field is empty.
•'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are 'N/A'.
Sustainability50/100
The core purpose of the tender, developing EV charging infrastructure, inherently contributes to environmental sustainability. However, the tender documentation does not explicitly include additional green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus beyond the project's primary objective.
•No explicit additional green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social aspects mentioned.