Security and Information Risk Advisor (SIRA) services

This tender for SIRA services presents a mixed quality, with clear service descriptions but significant gaps in critical information such as evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements, alongside a critical data inconsistency regarding its active status versus documented cancellation.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the AI-extracted summary, along with a missing reveal date, indicates potential gaps in full legal disclosure. The conflicting information about the tender's cancellation in one document while its status is 'active' is a significant process issue.

The description of the required SIRA services and the organization's context is clear and unambiguous. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are also well-defined. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are provided. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria. The conflicting information regarding the tender's cancellation also points to an incomplete or inconsistent overall data set.

The tender's estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements, while specific, do not appear overtly tailored to a single company. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the selection process, raising significant fairness concerns. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which aids practical planning. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement. While documents are listed as available, an explicit URL for tender documents is not provided in the summary.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. However, there is a critical inconsistency where the tender's status is 'active' while the content summary of an official PDF document explicitly states that the 'procurement was cancelled'. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for Type and Procedure.

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not identified as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader public value considerations.