Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type as 'Restricted' and 'Competitive flexible procedure' with an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes. The requirement for an NDA and Tender Security Questionnaire for access to full documents is acceptable for a project of national security significance. However, the initial announcement lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are standard in public procurement and should be clearly stated or referenced.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated in the initial announcement.
Clarity80/100
The description of the project, its strategic aspirations, and the intent to appoint two partners for a zero-value framework is clear and unambiguous. Evaluation criteria (price, quality, technical capability, and sustainability) are explicitly stated. While AI-extracted requirements are clear, the full detailed requirements and performance conditions are gated behind the NDA/TSQ process.
•Detailed technical specifications and performance conditions are not immediately available, requiring access to further documents.
Completeness70/100
All basic information, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and key deadlines, is provided. CPV and NUTS codes are assigned. However, the full suite of tender documents is not directly attached or immediately accessible, requiring an initial submission process. The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the initial announcement also impacts completeness.
•Full tender documents are not immediately accessible without an initial submission.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly detailed in the initial announcement.
Fairness85/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and evaluation criteria are stated as objective (balancing price, quality, technical capability, and sustainability). Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, full document access is restricted by an NDA/TSQ, which, while justifiable for national security, limits immediate equal access. The initial submission via email is less aligned with modern e-procurement for equal access.
•Restricted access to full tender documents via NDA/TSQ.
•Initial NDA/TSQ submission via email rather than a fully integrated e-procurement platform.
Practicality65/100
A document URL to the Defence Sourcing Portal is provided for initial downloads. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While the main tender is likely via the portal, the initial NDA/TSQ submission is via email, which is less practical than a fully electronic process. The 'zero-value framework' nature, while common, requires bidders to understand the call-off mechanism without guaranteed work.
•Initial NDA/TSQ submission via email is not fully integrated into an e-procurement system.
•The 'zero-value framework' nature may present practical considerations for bidders regarding guaranteed work.
Data Consistency90/100
All key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (NDA/TSQ deadline, main submission deadline, contract start date) are logical and consistent with the overall timeline of a restricted framework agreement.
Sustainability50/100
Sustainability is explicitly included as an evaluation criterion, which is a positive aspect. However, the tender description does not provide specific details on green procurement standards, social aspects, or innovation focus beyond a general aspiration for modern standards. It is not EU funded.
•Lack of specific details on green procurement standards, social aspects, or innovation focus.