Community Safety Public Perception Survey

This tender presents a clear project description and specific technical requirements but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, eligibility, and financial requirements, significantly impacting its overall quality and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a clear reveal date and, more critically, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues, hindering transparency and fair competition.

The project description and AI-extracted technical capability requirements are clear and understandable. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed, significantly reducing overall clarity.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are largely complete. However, the tender is notably incomplete due to the absence of specific eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and the critical omission of evaluation criteria, which are fundamental components of a comprehensive tender document.

The estimated value is disclosed, which is positive for fairness. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major impediment to objective and transparent assessment. The absence of e-submission and the missing reveal date also detract from equal access and fair preparation time for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which aids practical planning. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders and the contracting authority.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for the procedure type, but these do not significantly impact the overall integrity of the data provided.

The tender includes an innovation focus, which is a positive aspect. While the project itself has inherent social value, the tender documentation lacks explicit green procurement or broader social criteria for the delivery partner, limiting its overall sustainability ambition.