Skip to main content
Tenders

"Airlock" Output Checking System OCS Decision Engine Development Partner

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
013938-2026
Value
£2,400,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£2,400,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North West England
Type
Open Procedure
66
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

UKB is seeking to further improve its technical controls and intends to implement a functional mechanism to check data egress requests to ensure that participant record-level data is not being removed and does not contain information that can identify individual participants. This Output Checking System (OCS) functionality will allow UKB to enhance the security of the UKB-RAP, reduce the risk of advertent and inadvertent data breaches and importantly increase the trust and transparency of the UKB resource. UKB intends to commence a procurement exercise to procure a replacement for the current UKB-RAP in 2027, which will come into effect in 2028. The OCS will need to be integrated with the new UKB-RAP. Output checking processes for Trusted Research Environments (TREs) have to date been based on manual processes, with data analysts or administrators employed to review data egress requests to ensure they meet compliance standards. Given their reliance on human oversight of large data outputs, these systems are costly and do not provide a failsafe, and they cannot scale to the demands of UKB given its very large user base and continued growth. With over 20,000 publications (5,000 in the past year alone), a manual output checking process is neither desirable nor feasible. To develop and deliver the OCS, UKB is separating the procurement into two elements which will need to be fully interoperable: 1. OCS User Interface (UI) and Workflow (subject to a separate tender exercise via the CCS G-Cloud 14 framework): The development of a seamless UI and Workflow for the OCS, including secure movement of data and integration with existing UKB infrastructure. 2. The OCS Decision Engine (this procurement): The development of the core algorithms to allow an automated assessment of the data being egressed, giving an overall confidence assessment score and a Red/Amber/Green (RAG) rating for decision making The OCS Decision Engine The OCS Decision Engine is made up of two components: 1. Data Trust Engine: reviews the egressed file(s) from UKB-RAP to detect the presence of sensitive information. Through the application of transparent, heuristic rules and configurable thresholds, the Data Trust Engine will create a score for how 'disclosive' the egressed data is that, when coupled with the researcher confidence score below, provides a Red (fail), Amber (unclear) or Green (pass) egress rating. 2. Researcher Behaviour Engine: derives the overall credibility of a given researcher within AMS and UKB-RAP, and assigns a confidence score, which will dictate how human-review decisions are made for 'Amber' outcomes from the Trust Engine. This Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) is being issued to invite Bids for a development partner to design and deliver the OCS Decision Engine, which will include the Data Trust Engine and Researcher Behaviour Engine. The estimated contract value for the provision of services as set out in this Contract Notice and for the duration described is anticipated to be £2m GBP UKB reserves the right to discontinue or delay the procurement process and may decide not to award a contract as a result of this call for competition. UKB shall not be liable for any costs or expenses incurred by any organisation in considering and/or responding to the procurement process. Tenders and supporting documents must be priced in pounds sterling and all payments made under the contract will be in pounds sterling, unless otherwise advised. UKB will incorporate a standstill period at the point the decision in relation to the award of the contracts is notified to bidders. The standstill period, which will be a minimum of eight (8) working days, provides time for unsuccessful bidders to lodge an appeal in regards to the award decisions, before the contracts are entered into. Tenderers are advised to allow adequate time for uploading documents and to dispatch the electronic response well in advance of the closing time to avoid any last minute problems NOTE: To register your interest in this notice and obtain any additional information please visit the myTenders Web Site at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=233323. A user guide is available at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/sitehelp/help_guides.aspx.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (7)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Register interest in this notice via the myTenders website at https://www.mytenders.co.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=233323.
--Dispatch the electronic response well in advance of the closing time to avoid last-minute problems.
--Adhere to the submission deadline: 2026-04-02T00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--(None explicitly stated in the provided text.)
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--(None explicitly stated in the provided text.)
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Ability to develop and deliver the Output Checking System (OCS) Decision Engine.
--Capability to design and deliver the Data Trust Engine component, which reviews egressed files to detect sensitive information using transparent, heuristic rules and configurable thresholds.
--Capability to design and deliver the Researcher Behaviour Engine component, which derives researcher credibility and assigns a confidence score.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Tenders and supporting documents must be priced in pounds sterling (GBP).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

66
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a clear project description and good practical details but suffers from significant gaps in completeness and clarity due to missing evaluation criteria and the lack of content from attached documents. While innovative, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and mentions a standstill period, indicating adherence to UK procurement regulations. However, the provided text lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance.

Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text
Missing explicit eligibility requirements in the provided text
Clarity60/100

The project description is very clear, detailing the problem, the technical solution, and its components. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Performance conditions not explicitly detailed
Completeness50/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration are present. However, the analysis indicates that while 9 documents are attached, no content or summaries are available for them, which is a major gap. The absence of evaluation criteria also impacts completeness.

No content available for the 9 attached documents
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness55/100

The estimated value is disclosed, e-procurement is enabled via myTenders, and the technical requirements appear generic rather than tailored. Nevertheless, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the transparency and objectivity of the selection process, impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality90/100

The tender scores highly on practicality, with clear support for electronic submission, a provided document URL (myTenders), and clearly specified contract start date and duration. Financing information is also available.

Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include empty fields for 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code', and a slight currency discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and GBP.

Minor empty fields (Liable Person, Type Code, Procedure Code)
Minor currency discrepancy (EUR vs GBP, though values are close)
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement or social criteria. However, the project itself, focusing on automating data egress checking to enhance security and trust, demonstrates a strong inherent innovation focus.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description, outlining the problem and the proposed technical solution.
Transparent disclosure of estimated contract value and duration.
Support for electronic submission and clear access to the procurement portal (myTenders).
Strong innovation focus inherent in the project's objective to automate data egress checking.

Concerns

Critical absence of evaluation criteria, which hinders transparency and fairness for bidders.
Lack of content for the 9 attached tender documents in the provided analysis, suggesting crucial information might be missing.
Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the provided text.
No explicit mention of green procurement or social responsibility criteria.

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible and their content is clearly summarized or provided to bidders.
2. Explicitly state all evaluation criteria, including weighting, to ensure transparency and objectivity in the selection process.
3. Clearly outline mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the main tender notice or easily accessible documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline