Audits of tobacco, vapes and other nicotine products

This tender provides a clear description and specific requirements for market audits, but its quality is significantly hampered by the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of electronic submission, impacting transparency and fairness.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and there are no reported disputes. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance concern regarding transparency and equal treatment.

The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria makes the tender process opaque, significantly reducing overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV codes are provided. Nevertheless, the lack of defined evaluation criteria represents a major gap in the tender documentation.

While requirements do not appear tailored, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the selection process. Additionally, the lack of e-submission can hinder equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' for procedure codes.

The tender explicitly includes 'Innovation Focus' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, which are positive aspects for sustainability. However, it is noted as 'Not green procurement' and 'Not EU funded'.